“If you think research is expensive, try
disease.” In that simple phrase, advocate
Mary Lasker (1901-1994) summed up the case for investing more in the future of
health and health care. Because the
nation’s elected officials, with the enthusiastic support of the public,
responded to that wisdom, Americans’ life expectancy increased dramatically in
the second half of the twentieth century, and the U.S. became the global leader
in life sciences. Just as most American
families can point to research as the “game-changer” in protecting the health—and
often the very life—of someone near to them, our nation can point to research
for an estimated
50-fold return to our economy. But
our once-undisputed lead is now forecast to end (see Battelle
and Georgia
Tech reports). This means new
businesses and jobs will be created elsewhere, not here. So why aren’t we making research more of a centerpiece,
instead of an after-thought, when we talk about health care reform? According to polls commissioned by Research!America, 71% of the
American public says research
is part of the solution to containing health care costs, not part of the
problem. The public supports stronger
investment in research; our President and the Congress should act on their
behalf.
Comments